Continuous Threat Exposure Management or CTEM: A New Security Approach For CISOs

In the landscape of ever-evolving cyber threats, how can organizations safeguard their digital assets with efficacy and speed? Continuous threat exposure management (CTEM) stands out as the proactive cybersecurity frontier. This real-time strategy transcends traditional, reactive security measures by consistently scanning the digital horizon to identify and prioritize threats before they inflict damage. By the end of this article, you’ll have a clear understanding of CTEM’s principles, its integral role in fortifying defenses, and practical steps for crafting a robust CTEM program tailored to your organization’s needs.

Key Takeaways: 

  • Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) provides a proactive, real-time approach to cybersecurity, moving beyond reactive strategies to prioritize and remediate threats before they lead to exploitation, focusing on continuous monitoring, risk assessment, and threat prioritization aligned with business objectives.

  • A robust CTEM program is built on a framework with five critical stages—Scoping, Discovery, Prioritization, Validation, and Mobilization—and is integrated seamlessly with existing security controls enhancing management and prioritization of threats without the need for overhauling current frameworks.

  • CTEM strategies reinforce an organization’s security posture by proactively managing exposures, prioritizing risks based on business impact, ensuring cloud environment coverage, aligning with business goals and compliance, and streamlining remediation processes through automation and cross-team collaboration.

 

The Imperative of Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

In an era where cyber threats are as unpredictable as they are damaging, organizations must adopt a proactive stance to stay one step ahead. Enter Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)—a real-time, proactive approach to cybersecurity that aims to strengthen an organization’s security posture. CTEM distinguishes itself from traditional reactive vulnerability management approaches by continuously monitoring the threat landscape, enabling an organization to prioritize and remediate threats before exploitation occurs.

By surfacing and actively prioritizing threats in real-time, CTEM offers a more resilient security posture, enabling proactive threat mitigation across different environments, including cloud landscapes.

Understanding CTEM's Core Objectives

The core objectives of a successful CTEM program revolve around continuous monitoring, risk assessment, and prioritization. The discovery phase is crucial, involving the identification of all vulnerable resources, evaluating risk profiles, and focusing on potential business impacts.

CTEM involves:

  • Evaluating the risk associated with each asset and ranking them, ensuring resources focus on the most significant risks first

  • Placing a significant emphasis on validation to verify cybersecurity posture following threat prioritization and remediation efforts

  • Aligning CTEM’s objectives with business priorities to ensure that threats most material to the business are addressed effectively.

CTEM's Role in Cyber Resilience

CTEM’s role in cyber resilience cannot be overstated. It enables continual improvement of security posture by proactively identifying and remediating vulnerabilities before they are exploited by attackers. By integrating external attack surface management, CTEM strengthens defenses along post-perimeter attack surfaces.

CTEM (Cyber Threat and Event Management) provides the following benefits:

  • Ensures that an organization’s defenses remain up-to-date and capable of combating evolving cyber threats

  • Provides organizations with a real-time view of their cybersecurity risk posture

  • Helps in making informed security decisions

  • Facilitates effective resource allocation

>> Gartner says EASM Is Foundational For Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) & Penetration Testing (Learn Why)

 
Crafting a Robust CTEM Program for Your Organization

Crafting a robust CTEM program involves:

  • Assessing the current security posture

  • Defining clear objectives and strategy

  • Selecting and deploying the right tools

  • Establishing processes for continuous monitoring and analysis

  • Creating a culture of continuous improvement

  • Ensuring compliance with relevant regulations and industry standards

This comprehensive approach goes beyond simply installing the latest security software and helps to create a strong and effective CTEM program.

The result? A strengthened organization’s security posture and a resilient organization ready to tackle the dynamic nature of threats and vulnerabilities in the cybersecurity landscape.

The Five Pillars of a CTEM Framework

The backbone of a CTEM program is its framework, which consists of five critical stages: Scoping, Discovery, Prioritization, Validation, and Mobilization.

The cybersecurity process involves three main phases:

  1. Scoping: Determine which assets are most critical and assess the associated risks to prioritize protection efforts.

  2. Discovery: Identify vulnerable assets, contributing to a comprehensive catalogue of at-risk resources.

  3. Prioritization: Evaluate and rank assets based on their importance and level of threat posed.

Validation includes strategic plans implementation and security controls effectiveness testing. Lastly, the Mobilization phase defines the operational scope and involves the use of automated solutions to manage known issues.

Integrating CTEM with Existing Security Controls

CTEM is not about overhauling your existing security framework; it’s about enhancing it. CTEM programs seamlessly integrate with current controls, enhancing the overall management and prioritization of threat exposure. It empowers security operations teams to use attack surface and threat intelligence in their investigations, allowing them to focus on remediating the most impactful exposures.

CTEM utilizes continuous automation tools for scanning digital assets and promptly identifying vulnerabilities, narrowing the window of opportunity for potential attackers. The bottom line is, integrating CTEM with existing security controls leads to a more robust and resilient security posture.


Elevating Security Posture Through Proactive Exposure Management 

A key strategy to elevate an organization’s security posture is through proactive exposure management. This involves:

  • Identifying and mitigating potential vulnerabilities before they are exploited

  • Contrasting with reactive approaches that address threats after they occur

  • Assessing cybersecurity risks by evaluating potential harm against the likelihood of threats

  • Enhancing communication between security teams and executives

  • Fostering a cybersecurity culture and strategic alignment of threat mitigation strategies

This proactive approach enhances communication between security teams and security leaders, fostering a cybersecurity culture and strategic alignment of threat mitigation strategies within the security team.

The result is a significant decrease in security risks, improved threat detection, and faster response to remediation, indicating the success of a proactive CTEM program.

 

Identifying and Mitigating Potential Attack Paths

No battle is won without understanding the enemy’s possible attack paths. In the context of cybersecurity, effective attack path analysis helps identify critical vulnerabilities and pathways, enabling targeted mitigation efforts. By examining system components and interactions, potential sequences of actions by an attacker can be mapped, enabling more targeted mitigation efforts.

Effective attack path management reveals weak links within the system and leads to proactive mitigation efforts, thereby fortifying the organization’s defenses.

Prioritizing Risks Based on Business Impact

The process of risk prioritization is integral to an effective CTEM program. By prioritizing threats based on their likelihood and potential business impact, resources can be focused on the most significant risks. Using a risk matrix in cybersecurity helps define the level of risk by categorizing the likelihood of a threat against the severity of its potential impact, aiding in risk-based decision making.

This approach ensures that organizations make informed security decisions and allocate resources effectively to reduce the impact of cyber attacks.

Exposure Management for to Overcome Resource Limitations & Compliance Regulations

 

>> FireCompass combines ASM with automated pen testing which is crucial for an effective CTEM program



Navigating the Attack Surface with Advanced CTEM Tactics

The rise of cloud-based operations and remote work has expanded the attack surface, making it more challenging for security teams to monitor and secure. Advanced CTEM tactics address the expanding attack surface, including identity management and coverage across cloud environments. It involves a full analysis of exposures, extending across both on-premises and cloud environments, and assesses their impact on critical assets in these integrated environments.

By incorporating external attack surface management, organizations can enhance their defenses against external threats by addressing vulnerabilities and misconfigurations that could be exploited. This process helps to identify vulnerabilities, ensuring a more secure environment.

Addressing Identity Issues in Threat Management

As organizations grow, managing the identities of a diverse range of users and machines becomes a pressing challenge. Robust Identity and Access Management (IAM) capabilities are crucial for preventing threats from exploiting identity-related security gaps.

Implementing robust IAM capabilities within a CTEM framework can proactively prevent threats from exploiting identity-related security gaps, thereby fortifying the organization’s defenses.

Ensuring Coverage Across Cloud Environments

As organizations move towards cloud-based operations, ensuring coverage across these environments becomes crucial. CTEM extends its threat management capabilities to cloud-based environments, enabling:

  • Continuous and automated assessment of an evolving attack surface

  • Real-time assessment of the attack surface using global databases of security information

  • Tracking changes in the attack surface

  • Prioritizing attacks to address across third-party cloud ecosystems

By utilizing cloud security posture management capabilities, organizations can enhance their security posture in cloud-based environments.


Aligning CTEM with Business Goals and Compliance Risks

The success of any cybersecurity initiative is closely tied to its alignment with business goals and compliance risks. CTEM offers a proactive approach to assess and mitigate risks, aligning cybersecurity with business and compliance objectives. This alignment ensures that the protection of critical business assets and processes are prioritized, and the CTEM program integrates with governance, risk, and compliance functions to enhance the security posture.

Balancing Security Investments with Business Risk

Balancing security investments with business risk is a critical aspect of a successful CTEM program. Organizations that prioritize security investments guided by CTEM are three times less likely to suffer a data breach.

Clear communication facilitated by CTEM between security teams and business executives ensures that threat mitigation efforts are aligned with the organization’s broader goals.

Addressing Compliance Risks with CTEM

CTEM plays a significant role in addressing compliance risks. It integrates with compliance frameworks through a systematic framework of:

  • Scoping

  • Discovery

  • Prioritization

  • Validation

  • Mobilization

This framework aligns with business objectives and regulatory requirements.

The cyclic approach of CTEM effectively anticipates and remediates threats, enabling organizations to continuously evaluate, prioritize, and mitigate risks to meet compliance requirements.


Streamlining Remediation Processes in CTEM

Streamlining remediation processes is a critical aspect of CTEM. It involves:

  • Operationalizing findings by adhering to defined communication standards

  • Documenting cross-team approval workflows

  • Leveraging automation for streamlined vulnerability resolution processes.

Automating Vulnerability Remediation

Automation plays a key role in enhancing efficiency within CTEM. It streamlines communication, collaboration, and workflows across teams, reducing manual coordination and expediting response times for remediation.

Automated ticketing systems and SOAR (Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response) platforms are integrated within CTEM to efficiently address vulnerabilities and mitigate threats.

Orchestrating Cross-Team Approval Workflows

Effective cross-team approval workflows ensure seamless communication and collaboration for efficient vulnerability management. To successfully orchestrate these workflows, it’s essential to integrate a CTEM plan with organizational-level remediation and incident workflows, expanding focus beyond just technical fixes.

The mobilization phase of CTEM involves rallying all stakeholders to understand the need for a more engaged approach to cybersecurity risk management.


Measuring CTEM Success: Metrics and KPIs

To gauge the success of a CTEM program, organizations need to measure key performance indicators (KPIs) including the level of risk reduction, enhanced threat detection capabilities, and accelerated response times for remediation. By diminishing the blast radius and impact of security incidents, strengthening the security posture, and reducing breach-related costs, organizations can assess the success of a CTEM program.

Tracking Risk Reduction Over Time

Tools such as Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) enable ongoing evaluation of security controls and risk reduction over time. Studies show that organizations implementing a proper continuous threat exposure management (CTEM) solution experience a significant decrease in the likelihood of a severe breach, with a reduction of up to 90%.

Evaluating the Efficiency of Security Control Systems

Evaluating the efficiency of security control systems helps organizations assess the effectiveness of their CTEM program and make informed decisions. Monitoring and control systems, such as Security Control Validation (SCV) and Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS), are tools used to simulate real-world attack scenarios to evaluate the performance of security controls.

The efficiency of security controls can be assessed based on their performance improvement over time, with measurements facilitated by these specific tools.

Summary

As cyber threats continue to evolve, organizations need a proactive, continuous, and comprehensive approach to manage these threats. Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) provides such an approach, enhancing an organization’s security posture, aligning with business objectives, and meeting compliance requirements. By implementing a robust CTEM program, organizations can stay one step ahead of cyber threats, making their defenses more resilient.


Frequently Asked Questions

What distinguishes CTEM from traditional threat intelligence?

CTEM is distinctive from traditional threat intelligence because it is proactive and offers specific mitigation advice tailored to an organization's threats.

How does CTEM enhance an organization's security posture?

CTEM enhances an organization's security posture by continuously monitoring the threat landscape and prioritizing and remediating threats before exploitation occurs. This helps the organization stay ahead of potential security risks.

What is the role of Identity and Access Management (IAM) in CTEM?

IAM plays a crucial role in preventing threats from exploiting identity-related security gaps within a CTEM framework. It is essential for maintaining a secure environment.

How does CTEM address compliance risks?

CTEM addresses compliance risks by integrating with compliance frameworks and aligning with business objectives and regulatory requirements, using a systematic approach that includes scoping, discovery, prioritization, validation, and mobilization.

How can the success of a CTEM program be measured?

The success of a CTEM program can be measured by assessing key performance indicators (KPIs) such as risk reduction, threat detection capabilities, and response time for remediation. These indicators provide a clear measure of the program's effectiveness.


 
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of CISO Platform to add comments!

Join CISO Platform

RSAC Meetup Banner

CISO Platform

A global community of 5K+ Senior IT Security executives and 40K+ subscribers with the vision of meaningful collaboration, knowledge, and intelligence sharing to fight the growing cyber security threats.

Join CISO Community Share Your Knowledge (Post A Blog)