Revolutionizing Incident Response and Building True Cyber Resilience

Actionable Insights For CISOs:

1. Shift your focus from detection to investigation

Insight: The blog emphasises that the real bottleneck in incident response isn’t detection—it’s investigation. Alerts are plentiful, but turning those alerts into actionable conclusions is where work stalls.

Action steps:

Map your current incident lifecycle: how many alerts → how many investigations → how many incidents resolved, and measure time spent in the investigation phase.
Set a target to reduce “mean investigation time” (from first alert to root-cause clarity) by, say, 30-50% over the next 12 months.
Implement tools/workflows that provide forensic-level evidence rapidly (e.g., integrated endpoint evidence collection, timeline builders) so your analysts don’t have to piece evidence together manually.
Conduct regular after-action reviews of investigations that took the longest: what slowed them? Was it data access, tool fragmentation, missing logs? Use that to feed process/tool improvements.

2. Maximise value from your existing security stack — don’t just add more alerts

Insight: Ozkaya argues that piling on more alerts (from SIEMs, EDR, XDR) doesn’t equal resilience; instead you should convert your stack into an intelligence-pipeline that surfaces answers, not just signals.

Action steps:

Inventory all current alerting tools and systems (SIEM, EDR, XDR, NDR etc) and catalog the volume, noise level, false positives, and downstream investigation burden they create.
For each tool, evaluate: “Is the signal actionable? Does it lead to decisive investigation or does it generate more work for the analyst?”
Introduce or integrate platforms that can enrich alerts with context (asset risk, past incidents, threat intelligence) and automate triage decisions (escalate vs dismiss) to speed up investigation.
Retire or repurpose redundant alert sources that contribute noise and drain analyst time.

3. Democratise investigations and strengthen front-line analyst capability

Insight: Investigations shouldn’t require only elite forensics expertise; they should be fast, accessible, and collaborative across the SOC. Ozkaya highlights the need to empower junior analysts and free senior staff for strategic work.

Action steps:

Define investigation workflow tiers: Tier 1/2 handle triage and basic investigation, Tier 3/Forensics handle advanced attribution. Provide tooling and guided workflows so T1/T2 can perform more without delaying.
Provide training and playbooks that allow frontline analysts to carry out investigation actions (evidence collection, root-cause trace, timeline creation) with confidence.
Monitor analyst burnout and throughput: If senior staff are overloaded with simple investigations, fix tooling or workflow so their time is focused on higher-value tasks.
Foster cross-team collaboration (SOC, IR, forensics, legal) so investigations progress smoothly rather than being stuck with hand-offs.

4. Align incident response (IR) processes with business continuity and compliance

Insight: The blog connects modern IR not just with cyber-breach mitigation but with business resilience, regulatory audit readiness and the ability to act decisively.

Action steps:

Review your IR processes and map them directly to business-impact metrics: e.g., time to containment, business-unit downtime, regulatory breach risk.
Ensure your IR toolkit records investigation evidence in a way that supports audit-trail needs (e.g., for NIS2, DORA or ISO 27001). Ozkaya mentions that traceability and conclusive investigations matter.
Incorporate service-continuity and business-operation recovery as core KPIs inside IR playbooks, not just “eradicate malware” or “patch vulnerability.”
Periodically test IR workflows (tabletop or simulation) with business-leaders present to validate recovery plans and communication protocols.

5. Use automation and tooling strategically to overcome talent shortage

Insight: Given the global shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals, Ozkaya suggests using automation and platforms that let less-experienced staff be productive, freeing up senior specialists for mission-critical tasks.

Action steps:

Identify repetitive tasks in your IR workflow (evidence collection, log aggregation, alert enrichment, call-tree contact management) and automate them.
Evaluate or pilot “investigation-assist” tools that provide guided workflows, dashboards with root-cause hypothesis, and forensic-level data extraction without deep manual effort.
Measure ROI in terms of cases per analyst, time to resolution, and cost per incident before vs after automation.
Ensure that automation is aligned with your skill-uplift strategy: automation doesn’t replace analysts, but augments their capability.

6. For MSSPs and SOC providers: build differentiated service offerings based on investigation-outcomes

Insight: Ozkaya points out that for MSSPs and MSPs, the shift is moving from detection-only (alerting clients) to providing conclusive investigations and response capabilities, turning across end-to-end into value-driven service.

Action steps:

If you are an MSSP/managed SOC provider, define service tiers: e.g., basic alerting, advanced investigation and root-cause delivery, full IR/responder offering. Highlight investigation as the value differentiator.
Build multi-tenant investigation platforms, unified dashboards, standard workflows to scale across clients without adding linear headcount cost.
Define and track investigation-centric KPIs for clients: e.g., “alerts triaged to root-cause,” “time to containment,” “repeat-incident frequency,” to show measurable value.
Use automation and guided investigation flows to allow Tier 1 analysts to handle more client IR work, reserving Tier 3 for client-critical escalations.

About Author:

Dr. Erdal Ozkaya is a veteran cybersecurity leader with nearly three decades of experience spanning IT, cyber-risk, governance and leadership roles. He has served as a Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) and advisor to global organisations, drawing on deep expertise in building and maturing security programmes across diverse sectors.

An award-winning author, speaker and community builder, Erdal is known for connecting the complex world of cybersecurity to practical outcomes and fostering peer networks among CISOs and security executives. He is committed to continuous learning and advancing the discipline of cyber leadership for the evolving digital-risk landscape.

Now, let’s hear directly from Dr. Erdal Ozkaya on this subject:

Curtesy of Binalyze

Cyber threats are relentless and constantly evolving. Organizations face an increasingly complex threat landscape, compounded by a persistent shortage of cybersecurity talent, overwhelming alert volumes, and pressure to ensure uninterrupted business operations.

Against this backdrop, the need for a modernized, intelligence-driven approach to incident response has never been greater. This is not simply about reacting faster, it’s about achieving cyber resilience without adding operational complexity. It’s about maximizing the value of your existing security stack, improving efficiency, and accelerating response times to protect what matters most: business continuity.

Today’s SOCs are flooded with alerts. Detection tools have done their job well—perhaps too well. SIEMs, EDRs, and XDR platforms surface endless alerts, each demanding attention, triage, and context. But for all their speed and scale, they stop short of delivering what teams really need: conclusive answers.

Cyber resilience doesn’t come from more alerts. It comes from knowing what matters, acting quickly, and responding with confidence. That requires investigations without limits.

The Real Bottleneck in Incident Response

Investigations remain one of the slowest, most manual phases of the response lifecycle. Analysts waste time jumping between tools, chasing incomplete logs, or waiting on access to evidence. Even identifying the root cause—a basic requirement for meaningful response—can take days.

This isn’t just inefficient. It’s risky. Without timely, conclusive investigation:

Threats linger, sometimes unnoticed.
Compliance deadlines are missed.
The same attacker comes back.

Why It’s Time to Rethink the Role of Investigation

As the threat landscape evolves, investigation must move from being a last resort to a first-class capability:

To validate and escalate alerts faster. Not every signal warrants a war room. The sooner teams can determine impact and priority, the better.
To shorten time-to-containment. Delays often stem not from detection, but from uncertainty. Clear raw evidence enables decisive action.
To meet rising regulatory expectations. Frameworks like ISO 27001, NIS2 and DORA demand audit-ready investigations. Circumstantial isn’t enough.

Investigation shouldn’t require elite forensics expertise or specialist-only tools. It should be fast, collaborative, and accessible across the SOC.

Maximize the ROI of Your Existing Security Investments

Security teams often find themselves overwhelmed by the volume of alerts produced by their SIEM, EDR, and XDR systems. Rather than functioning as an “alert factory,” your security stack should evolve into an intelligence pipeline—one that surfaces actionable insights instead of raw noise.

Actionable, effective insights come with conclusive evidence. Modern tools can plug directly into your existing infrastructure to deliver forensic-level insights in real-time. This enables your SOC to operate with clarity, reduces alert fatigue, and improves incident triage confidence. Most importantly, this evolution doesn’t require disruptive replacement—it’s about enhancing workflows intelligently, not reinvention.

Build Cyber Resilience Without Adding Complexity

Traditionally, powerful forensic and investigative capabilities have come with steep learning curves. But newer platforms are removing these barriers, offering expert-grade functionality through intuitive interfaces that don’t require deep forensic expertise or knowhow.

This democratizes investigations, allowing junior analysts to contribute meaningfully and consistently, while freeing senior staff to focus on more complex threats. The result is a more effective, collaborative, and confident security team, helping to close the cybersecurity skills gap from within.

Strengthen Compliance Posture with Evidence-Backed Response

In a regulatory environment that demands accountability, audit-ready investigations are essential. The right tools provide comprehensive, timeline-based evidence collection, enabling full traceability and defensibility for each incident.

This supports compliance with frameworks like ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, and other sector-specific mandates. With a clear, documented response process, organizations can face audits, regulatory disclosures, and internal reviews with confidence.

Address the Talent Shortage Without Compromising Quality

The global shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals is unlikely to be resolved in the near term. Organizations must find ways to scale expertise without increasing headcount.

Advanced solutions do just that. They act as a force multiplier, automating repetitive tasks and providing built-in knowledge that allow analysts to focus and quickly pivot into strategic actions. This improves onboarding efficiency for new staff and helps prevent burnout among seasoned professionals, contributing to long-term team sustainability.

For MSSPs and MSPs: Elevate Your Service Delivery and Unlock New Revenue

For Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs) and Managed Service Providers (MSPs), these capabilities represent a significant opportunity to scale operations, differentiate offerings, and grow revenue.

Deliver Faster, Smarter Service Without Adding Headcount: Cut investigation times across hundreds of endpoints while maintaining SLA commitments. These solutions enable your analysts to handle more cases, more quickly—transforming response speed into a competitive advantage.
Move from Detection to Resolution: Move beyond simply alerting clients to incidents. By integrating forensic-grade investigation capabilities, you can provide conclusive findings as part of your MDR or IR retainer services. This shift from signal to resolution adds immediate value to your engagements.
Empower Analysts Across All Tiers: Browser-based interfaces, guided workflows, and automation empower Tier 1 analysts to perform at Tier 3 levels. This not only reduces reliance on specialized forensic talent, but also improves consistency and outcomes across the board.
Unlock High-Margin Services Without Rebuilding Your Stack: With multi-tenant capabilities and low overhead, MSSPs can introduce IR services such as remote compromise assessments, forensic triage, or proactive compromise scanning—creating new revenue streams and upsell opportunities from existing MDR and SOC clients.
Prove Value with Evidence and Precision: Provide clients with detailed, timeline-based narratives and forensic evidence. This transparency builds trust and helps demonstrate quantifiable improvements in time-to-detect and time-to-respond—critical KPIs in today’s performance-driven security market.

The Path Forward: Resilience Through Intelligence

These capabilities are not aspirational—they’re already being delivered by forward-thinking platforms. Binalyze AIR is a prime example of a solution that embodies this next-generation approach, helping organizations and service providers alike:

Accelerate investigation and response
Strengthen compliance and audit readiness
Optimize team performance and morale
Extract more value from existing security investments

Whether you’re an enterprise security leader or an MSSP seeking to scale smarter, the future of cybersecurity lies not in complexity, but in clarity, intelligence, and speed. By transforming incident response into a proactive, resilient, and efficient process, you not only secure your organization—you enable it to thrive.

By: Dr. Erdal Ozkaya (Cybersecurity Advisor, Author, and Educator)

Original link to the blog: Click Here

All Articles